Summary of NICMOS flatfielding documents Dec 12, 2007 (One outstanding question: what about wavelength calibration? See notes at end) NICMOS ISR-95-005: Characterisation of NICMOS Array Flat-field Response. - used a SPARE array, not actual flight arrays - tested at Steward in 1995 - flashlight on wall provides illumination - used many filters, broad and narrow - very large change in dynamic range of variations short wavelength -- factors of 2 long wavelength -- factors of 10-20 percent? - important to locate spectral regions in which the pixel-to-pixel sensitivity changes rapidly, that's where color terms will be most important - conclude errors in flatfield response are around 4 percent NICMOS ISR-95-006: Effects of the NICMOS Array Flat-field Response on - numerical simulations of how the flat-field response measured for SPARE array might affect stellar photometry - sources were a 10,000 K blackbody and 700 K blackbody - typical error created by imperfect flatfielding <= 3 percent - biggest errors in passbands in which response changes most rapidly with wavelength NICMOS ISR-98-002: First NICMOS On-Orbit Flat-Fields: Results from SMOV Data - real on-orbit flats with internal lamp - dithered positions in 16-point pattern, then subtracted lamp-off exposures at same positions, to subtract background light - differences 2-3 percent between pre-flight and in-flight flats - common structure in diff passbands - some spots caused by debris on detector surfaces NICMOS ISR-98-011: NIC1 Narrow-band Earth Flats - exposures of Earth, streaked, in 1997 - combine exposures taken at different streak angles - only possible in narrow-band, as wide-band saturates - "super-shading" is special detector effect triggered only by (very intense) Earth exposures, must correct for it - some features visible in Earth-flat divided by lamp-flat - reduce stellar images with the two types of flats photometry differs at 1-2 percent level, at most only 2 isolated stars used in test, though NICMOS ISR-99-002: Color Dependence of NICMOS Flatfields - how to create a flatfield appropriate for a source which is very different in color than the source(s) used to create ordinary flatfields? - method A: interpolate on graph of sensitivity vs. wavelength to the wavelength of the source - method B: given spectrum of source, combine weighted average of narrowband flats to match source spectrum - can use either method Hmmm. Create flats for individual sources? Not a good idea for SNAP, methinks. NICMOS ISR 2002-004: SM3b Science Flats - based on internal lamp flats in 2002 - same set of dithered positions, with lamp-on minus lamp-off to get rid of background light - no obvious changes relative to earlier flats - some new "grot" due to stuff falling on detectors NICMOS ISR 2005-002: Grism Sensitivities and Apparent Non-Linearity - use the "ordinary" flatfields to correct the raw grism images - not sure what else to say here ... NICMOS ISR 2007-002: NICMOS Time Dependent Flat-fields - examine internal lamp flatfield images taken over span 2002-2007 - find general decrease in QE of about 1 percent over 5-year period - some large-scale spatial variations grow with time - changes could be due to a change in temperature of detector over time -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Wavelength calibration -- how? - McCarthy et al., 1999ApJ...520..548M, states "The rms accuracy of the wavelength calibration for G141 is about 0.002 micrometers " = 2 nm = 20 Angstroms. "Repeated calibration exposures have shown no changes larger than 3% in the wavelength zero point, or 1.5% in the dispersion." Does one use internal lamps for wavelength calibration of NICMOS? - no mention of wavelength calibration in NICMOS Handbook (???)