On the night of UT Jun 13, 2008, the SDSS Photometric Telescope ("PT" for short) took a series of exposures of HAT-4. The conditions were good, and we (probably) detected the ingress. The egress occurred long after our measurements ended.
Notes from the night
This is a chart of the field. HAT-4 is the bright star indicated by the crosshairs. The labelled stars will appear in later analysis. The star marked by two line segments turns out to be just too bright to use as a comparison with the 40-second exposure time.
As a side note, there are several eclipsing binary stars in this field. I had to mark them as "variable" before running the photometric solution below.
The host star of HAT-4 has a magnitude V=11.20 according to HAT-P-4b: A Metal-rich Low-Density Transiting Hot Jupiter .
Following the procedures outlined by Kent Honeycutt's article on inhomogeneous ensemble photometry, I used all stars available in each image to define a reference frame, and measured each star against this frame. You can find the software package used to do the ensemble photometry online; it's free!
The night was apparently fair. The graph below shows the amount by which instrumental magnitudes from each image needed to be shifted to match the ensemble reference. On a clear night, this graph would show a straight horizontal line.
Below is a graph of the scatter in differential magnitude versus magnitude in the ensemble solution.
HAT-4 is the star near differential mag 1.12; it shows a SMALL excess of scatter over neighboring stars of the same brightness. The "noise floor" in these measurements is about 0.004 mag -- not bad.
Below are the light curves for the target (green symbols) and some comparison stars in the field.
In this closeup, I have shifted the data for two comparison stars to move them closer in magnitude to the target.
I estimate by eye the ingress to occur at about 630.86. I see no egress in this dataset.
Justin's notes for this event indicate that the ingress was predicted to occur at 630.851, in fair agreement with my eyeball estimate. The egress was predicted to occur at 631.026, long after our run ended.
You can grab the measurements for your own analysis. Below is a table with three flavors of time, plus the differential magnitude of the target and an estimate of the uncertainty in each measurement. I show the first few lines of the file to give you an idea of its format.
# Measurements of HAT-4 made with APO PT, Jun 13, 2008 UT. # Each exposure 40 seconds long in SDSS i-band; # Tabulated times are midexposure (FITS header time - half exposure length) # and accurate only to +/- 1 second (??). # 'mag' is a differential magnitude based on ensemble photometry # using a circular aperture of radius 5.25 arcseconds. # # UT day JD-2,450,000 HJD-2,450,000 mag uncert Jun13.82842 4630.82842 4630.83074 1.189 0.004 Jun13.82986 4630.82986 4630.83218 1.192 0.004 Jun13.83130 4630.83130 4630.83362 1.191 0.004
Last modified 07/01/2008 by MWR.