On the night of Jun 28/29, 2020, under good conditions, I acquired images for astrometry of two nearby stars. One was Ross 248 , and the other GX And ; the latter is actually a double star, with two components separated by about 35 arcsec moving together.
This is one of the stars that a capstone student may study over the next year in a project involving parallax. Ross 248 is a relatively faint red star surrounded by many other stars of similar brightness, so it's a good candidate for high-precision parallax measurements.
The main setup was:
Notes from the night:
Satellite? It reminded me of an Iridium flare, but all the old Iridium satellites have left orbit. Could it be a flare from some other satellite? No information about such a satellite in Heavens Above's list for this morning. CalSky.com doesn't provide any good candidates, either.
The object is (currently) near position
RA = 23:41:55.27 Dec = +44:10:06.38 (J2000)
A chart of the field is shown below. The size of the chart is about 41 x 27 arcminutes. The noisy area at right (West) is the shadow of the guider's pickoff mirror.
I've marked the location of several comparison stars.
star UCAC4 B V r ------------------------------------------------------------------------- A UCAC4 671-120730 12.617 10.689 B UCAC4 671-120688 C UCAC4 671-120749 10.987 10.663 P kappa And 4.06 4.14 --------------------------------------------------------------------------
I took a photo of the finder TV's screen when pointing to Ross 248; this could be a useful reference for the future:
I ran the camera at -19 C, as it was just a bit too warm to reach the usual -20 C. Nothing out of the ordinary.
I took a series of 50 exposures of the field, using the R-band filter and an exposure time of 20 seconds.
Using the same techniques as described for earlier nights, I matched detected stellar positions to the Gaia DR2 catalog; as usual, I used a linear model and included all stars in the catalog.
sr=0 sc=200 nr=1300 nc=1400to restrict measurements from the pickoff mirror's shadow, but that includes a bunch of stars with coma. I tried using a more narrow box
cr=650 sc=1000 nr=1300 nc=1000and found that it yielded slightly smaller residuals from the Gaia DR2 catalog positions. In the future, I ought to use the smaller box for all measurements.
(The measurements recorded for tonight are based on the old, wider box, however).
This is my sixth measurement of Ross 248; measurements are shown as red crosses.
Like Ross 248, GX And is a nearby (binary) star which will be the target of a parallax project in the coming year. One of the two components is bright -- about mag V = 8 -- so one must use short exposures to prevent it from saturating the detector. That may mean that this system isn't as easy to measure as Ross 248 or some others.
The object is currently close to this position:
RA = 00:18:28.4 Dec = +44:01:31 (J2000)
but it does have a very high proper motion.
A chart of the field is shown below. The size of the chart is about 41 x 27 arcminutes. The noisy area at right (West) is the shadow of the guider's pickoff mirror.
The two components of the GX And binary sit inside the box. I've marked the location of several comparison stars as well.
star UCAC4 B V r ----------------------------------------------------------- A 671-001473 9.939 9.790 B 670-001639 9.413 8.472 C 671-001509 12.712 11.421 11.001 -----------------------------------------------------------
I took a photo of the finder TV's screen when pointing to GX And; this could be a useful reference for the future:
I took two series of 50 exposures of the field, using the R-band filter and an exposure time of only 5 seconds. During the second series, especially, the sky brightened considerably as dawn approached.
Using the same techniques as described for earlier nights, I matched detected stellar positions to the Gaia DR2 catalog.
The target is clearly moving in the positive RA direction, as we would expect from its known (large) proper motion.
I tried taking images of M31, just for fun, as dawn approached. I set the guider running on a reasonably bright star, using a 5-second exposure time.
Combining the images via a median procedure yielded an image rather more pleasant than the one from last week; the stripes were not so pronounced. Maybe last week's conditions just weren't very good. Don't give up on pretty pictures completely.
Last modified 6/29/2020 by MWR.