Jul 12, 2016 UT: Photometry of SN 2016coj in NGC 4125 (and new focuser!)

Michael Richmond
Jul 12, 2016

On the night of Jul 11/12, 2016, I observed SN 2016coj in NGC4125.

The main setup was:

Notes from the night

SN 2016coj is a Type Ia supernova in the relatively nearby galaxy NGC4125. It was discovered by the KAIT group some time before maximum light:

Here's a chart showing the galaxy, the SN, and some reference stars; the chart is about 12 x 12 arcminutes.

NGC 4125 RA = 12:08:05.7 Dec = +65:10:30 (J2000)

The AAVSO sequence team kindly provided photometry for stars near this object. You can see their full photometric sequence on their website. Below, I show only the members of that sequence which fall into my very small field of view -- taken from AAVSO sequence X16288FJI. Note that star "K" is so faint that I may not detect it clearly in B-band.

letter   B     sigB    V     sigV    R     sigR    I    sigI
------------------------------------------------------------------------
B      15.198 0.086  14.133 0.052  13.627 0.116  13.155 0.156 

C      13.317 0.093  12.673 0.058  12.316 0.121  11.980 0.161 

J      15.607 0.109  14.956 0.065  14.603 0.136  14.271 0.182  

K      16.573 0.123  15.975 0.082  15.547 0.174  15.147 0.231  

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

I used dark frames taken after all the SN 2016coj images.

I took sets of 15-20 images in each filter, guiding in VRI and B. I used longer guide exposure times in B and I. I discarded any trailed images. I used focus settings based on relative positions measured for a bright star earlier.

As explained in the notes to Jun 14, 2016, I used the "rotsub" technique to remove the galaxy's light at the position of the SN.

On this night, I used "method 2", which means performing "rotsub" on each individual image, then combining all the resulting images in a passband to make a "master rotsub" image.

Using aperture photometry with a radius of 4 pixels (radius of 5.5 arcsec) I measured the instrumental magnitudes of a number of reference stars and the target. Following the procedures outlined by Kent Honeycutt's article on inhomogeneous ensemble photometry, I used all stars available in each image to define a reference frame, and measured each star against this frame. I used the interim reference magnitudes above plus color terms which I am currently revising -- so please treat these results as preliminary to convert the ensemble instrumental magnitudes to the standard Johnson-Cousins BVRI scale.

Note that in the graph below, I combine data calibrated with UCAC4 photometry (first few weeks) with recent data calibrated with AAVSO photometry. That's inconsistent, and I'll re-compute all magnitudes later. Note further that I use only 2 AAVSO stars (B and C) for calibration, for consistency with earlier measurements; I'll use additional stars in my final calculations.


     filter  mag         mag_uncert                          Julian Date

   SN  B =   16.054   +/-   0.121  (ens  0.083 zp  0.089)    2457581.61469 
   SN  V =   14.891   +/-   0.041  (ens  0.041 zp  0.006)    2457581.60443 
   SN  R =   14.592   +/-   0.106  (ens  0.032 zp  0.101)    2457581.59143 
   SN  I =   14.250   +/-   0.115  (ens  0.053 zp  0.102)    2457581.62570 

Below is a preliminary light curve, based on RIT Observatory measurements. I also show measurements of SN 2011fe in M101, an ordinary type Ia supernova, shifted arbitrarily.


New JMI focuser on 12-inch

Jen Connelly and I installed a new JMI focusing unit on the 12-inch, and (finally) succeeded in getting it to talk to the dome computer, both via standalone software and MaximDL. This unit has an encoder, and so can go to specific positions. This should help us to do a better job of focusing. We checked to see if there were perceptible offsets in focus position between the filters in the SBIG ST-9 and its filterwheel.

Measured at about T = 77 F = 25 C:


     V    best focus   0.515 inches
     R    best focus   0.525 inches
     B    best focus   0.493 inches
     I    best focus   0.550 inches

One can derive relative offsets:

We'll need to perform additional tests and check these values before we settle on "official" offsets.


Last modified 07/11/2016 by MWR.