UT Aug 31, 2020: Astrometry of Ross 248 and GX And, photometry of RT And

Michael Richmond
Sep 5, 2020

On the night of Aug 30/31, 2020, under good conditions, I acquired test images of the eclipsing variable star RT And; one of my capstone students will be following it later this semester.

I also acquired images of Ross 248 and GX And for our continuing study of their parallax and proper motion.


RT And

You can find some basic information on this star at the SIMBAD's page for it.

The main setup was:

Notes from the night:

I used the guider in the usual manner, which followed motions in RA, but not Dec (due to backlash in the Dec drive). However, at one point, when I re-set the guide star, the zero-point of the photometric solution jumped slightly, then gradually went back to its previous trend. When I made the change, the telescope drifted in Dec quickly for 10-20 frames before reaching some stable position. Huh. Watch out for similar effects whenever I re-set guide star.

The object is at



  RA = 23 11 17.9   Dec = +52 59 59.2    (J2000)

A chart of the field based on pictures tonight is shown below. The size of the chart is about 38 x 26 arcminutes.

The stars "A", "B", and "C" appear in the charts and tables for this field made by the AAVSO. see

I used the star labelled A = "102" to shift my R-band measurements to the "V" magnitude scale. Yes, that's right: shifting "R" to "V". It's wrong, but it will get us in the ballpark.

Here's a picture of the TV with the finder's field of view when pointing at RT And:

The dark current was normal this evening:

The sky value shows that the sky was mostly clear, but grew brighter towards dawn.

Here's a record of the telescope's drift. The big jump around JD 1092.85 occurs when I re-set the guide star.

The number of objects detected.

Although the FWHM was around 3.1 pixels, I found that a large aperture (of radius 5 pixels) reduced the effects of the jump due to the guider, compared to the usual radius of 4 pixels.

Using aperture photometry with a radius of 5 pixels (binned 2x2, each pixel is 1.25 arcsec, so a radius of 6.25 arcsec), I measured the instrumental magnitudes of a number of reference stars and the target. Following the procedures outlined by Kent Honeycutt's article on inhomogeneous ensemble photometry, I used all stars available in each image to define a reference frame, and measured each star against this frame.

Sigma-vs-mag plots show that the floor was about 0.010 mag overall, which is not great. The outlier at differential mag = 1.5 is RT And.

The zero-point of the photometric solution shows a sharp increase at the time of the guide-star adjustment.

Here are light curves of the variable and the field stars. Remember, the "magnitude" here is measured through an "R" filter, but shifted to match the "V" scale. Don't pay attention to the numbers.


Ross 248

This is one of the stars that a capstone student may study over the next year in a project involving parallax. Ross 248 is a relatively faint red star surrounded by many other stars of similar brightness, so it's a good candidate for high-precision parallax measurements.

These observations involved:

The object is (currently) near position



  RA = 23:41:55.27     Dec = +44:10:06.38    (J2000)

A chart of the field is shown below. The size of the chart is about 41 x 27 arcminutes. The noisy area at right (West) is the shadow of the guider's pickoff mirror.

I've marked the location of several comparison stars.



  star       UCAC4               B          V         r       
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

   A     UCAC4 671-120730      12.617     10.689                        

   B     UCAC4 671-120688                                            

   C     UCAC4 671-120749      10.987     10.663         


   P     kappa And              4.06       4.14

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

I took a photo of the finder TV's screen when pointing to Ross 248; this could be a useful reference for the future:

The sky value shows that the sky was mostly clear, with a brief bump due to some light cloud.

The number of objects detected.

I used an aperture with radius 4.0 pixels tonight, as usual.

Here are the positions I've measured so far. Note the clear motion to the south-east (lower-left).


GX And

Like Ross 248, GX And is a nearby (binary) star which will be the target of a parallax project in the coming year. One of the two components is bright -- about mag V = 8 -- so one must use short exposures to prevent it from saturating the detector. That may mean that this system isn't as easy to measure as Ross 248 or some others.

The object is currently close to this position:



  RA = 00:18:28.4  	  Dec = +44:01:31     (J2000)

but it does have a very high proper motion.

A chart of the field is shown below. The size of the chart is about 41 x 27 arcminutes. The noisy area at right (West) is the shadow of the guider's pickoff mirror.

The two components of the GX And binary sit inside the box. I've marked the location of several comparison stars as well.



  star       UCAC4               B          V          r
-----------------------------------------------------------

   A        671-001473          9.939      9.790        

   B        670-001639          9.413      8.472        

   C        671-001509         12.712     11.421     11.001

-----------------------------------------------------------

 

I took a photo of the finder TV's screen when pointing to GX And; this could be a useful reference for the future:

I took two series of 50 exposures of the field in R-band, using exposure times of 5 seconds.

Using the same techniques as described for earlier nights, I matched detected stellar positions to the Gaia DR2 catalog.

The target is clearly moving in the positive RA and Dec directions, as we would expect from its known (large) proper motion.


Last modified 9/5/2020 by MWR.