SN Taxonomy Michael Richmond May 12, 1996 Well, the "splitters" have been beating the "lumpers" in the SN classification business lately, so there is some new terminology. Let me exercise my memory here... SN Type characteristics guess at progenitor ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ia no hydrogen in spectrum white dwarf that accretes strong absoption at 6550 A > Chandrasekhar mass near max light two white dwarfs that late-time spectrum iron-group collide emission lines Ib no hydrogen in spectrum massive star which has absorption near 5700 A, due to been stripped of H He (plus other He lines) before core-collapse? late-time spectrum emission from Wolf-Rayet star? OI, CaII Ic no hydrogen in spectrum massive star which has no helium in spectrum been stipped of H and late-time spectrum emission from He before core-collapse OI, CaII Wolf-Rayet star? II-P hydrogen in spectrum, massive red supergiant with P-Cyngi profile light curve has plateau for 30-90 days soon after max light II-L hydrogen in spectrum, weak or less massive supergiant? no P-Cygni profile lost some of envelope? light curve falls linearly after max light IIb hydrogen in spectrum, but not much massive star which has helium in spectrum lost MOST (but not late-time spectrum emission from all) of its H OI, CaII, plus H envelope (in binary?) IIn hydrogen in spectrum, with narrow massive star which sits emission lines on top of in middle of massive broad emission features stellar outflow? slow decline in light curve at late times strong radio emitter? some aren't There's also a paper in a recent A&A which suggests a new classification scheme (based primarily on light curve properties?), but it hasn't been widely adopted, as far as I know. The old Zwicky classes (types III, IV, V) are not used at all at the current time, as far I as know.