Today's lab exercise should be carried out in pairs, ideally, but it's okay to do it by yourself or in a group of three.
In order to gain credit for this exercise, you must create a PDF document which provides the answers to all the questions: A, B, C, etc. Submit the PDF to the instructor via the "Assignments" tab in myCourses.
In order to carry out the tasks in this exercise, you will need several tools:
You may use a spreadsheet of some sort, or you may try one of a large number of programs designed for the analysis of datasets. I might suggest this one:
This exercise involves measurements of a very peculiar variable star named "V404 Cygni". Your first task is to make a finding chart of the field, so that you will be able to recognize stars and identify them in catalogs.
See chart below.
I observed this star at the RIT Observatory during the month of June, 2015. One of the images from these nights is shown below.
Can you find the four labelled stars A, B, C, and D, in some standard catalog? It will help if you can. I suggest using the APASS9 catalog for this exercise. You can access it within Aladin by choosing in the left-hand panel
Collections -> Catalog -> Vizier -> II-Photometric Data -> APASS - AAVSO Photometric All-Sky Survey
Label RA Dec APASS_recno -------------------------------------------------------------- A 306.077841 +33.886783 13926111 B 306.073663 +33.987620 13926136 C 20:24:03.826 +33:52:01.96 D 306.009408 +33.916131 13926129 --------------------------------------------------------------
I used the 12-inch telescope at the RIT Observatory to acquire a number of images on one night in June, 2015. All the images were taken through a V-band filter. I then processed the images and measured the intensity of each star in each image. The results are in a simple ASCII text file:
The datafile starts like this:
# Julian_Day A B C D 2457197.70876 4924.9 10064.7 5587.3 7372.2 2457197.71115 4897.8 9972.4 5500.5 7358.7 2457197.71148 4934.0 9944.9 5495.4 7413.1
Your first job is to use the Julian Date to figure out the exact night during which I made these measurements. I suggest looking for a tool for converting Julian Dates into ordinary dates. The American Association of Variable Star Observers (AAVSO) is a very good place to go for all sorts of information related to variable stars. Why not do a little searching for a tool they might have made?
start: Jun 24, 2015 EDT, end: Jun 24, 2015
AAVSO Julian Date converter
Take a first look at the data by making a graph of intensity versus Julian Date.
In order to convert intensities to magnitudes, and in order to shift the magnitudes to a standard scale, one must choose a reference star. It might help to look at the graph of intensities over time.
Star A, as it is closest in brightness to the target
# instrumental magnitudes, relative to ref star # Julian_Day A B C D # ------------------------------------------------------------------ 2457197.70876 0.000 -0.776 -0.137 -0.438 2457197.71115 0.000 -0.772 -0.126 -0.442 2457197.71148 0.000 -0.761 -0.117 -0.442 2457197.71182 0.000 -0.758 -0.104 -0.429 ------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, it was a good choice: A, B, D are all constant
You can now use the reference star to shift all the instrumental magnitudes to standard V-band magnitudes.
star A has V = 11.339
star B has V = 10.769
star D has V = 11.104
for star A, Δ = 11.339 - 0.0 = 11.339
Done.
You can check that your calibration process was valid by looking at the calibrated magnitudes of the other comaparison stars (besides the reference star) which you can find in the catalog. If things went well, the average calibrated magnitudes of the stars from our images should be close to the V-band magnitude for each star listed in the catalog.
Now star B has V = 10.56 +/- 0.01
Now star D has V = 10.90 +/- 0.01
Star APASS V my average V
----------------------------------------------------
B 10.77 +/- 0.01 10.56 +/- 0.01
D 11.10 +/- 0.00 10.89 +/- 0.01
----------------------------------------------------
No, they don't agree within the uncertainties ...
but the difference between them is 0.33 in catalog,
and 0.32 in my measurements. That's encouraging.
You are now ready to make a light curve of the target star, V404 Cygni, using your calibrated V-band magnitude measurements.
This light curve should show some pretty crazy changes in brightness over a pretty short period of time. This object, V404 Cygni, is actually not an ordinary star; nor is it a single star. Ordinary stars don't behave like this.
Just what sort of system is V404 Cygni? To find out, look at SIMBAD's entry for this star. Go to the References section and search for all papers published during the period 2016 to 2016 (don't worry, that just means all of the calendar year 2016).
Repetitive patterns in rapid optical variations in the nearby black-hole binary V404 Cygni
Okay.
Figure 2 b
Very similar -- though the entire light curve might be shifted vertically by 0.1 or 0.2 mag.
It's a black-hole binary system, containing a black hole and an "ordinary" star (a cool giant star) orbiting their common center of mass. Some of the material from the ordinary star flows away from its outer atmosphere and spirals into an accretion disk surrounding the black hole. It is the hot gas in this accretion disk which produces most of the light -- and the rapid changes in brightness -- that we see.
Copyright © Michael Richmond. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.